"Pedicle Screw/Sublaminar Hook Fixation versus Pedicle Screw/Infraspino" by Ahmad Fouad AbdelBaki Allam, Mohammad Fouad AbdelBaki Allam et al.
  •  
  •  
 

Corresponding Author

Ahmad Fouad AbdelBaki Allam

Subject Area

Degenerative, Lumbosacral spine

Article Type

Original Study

Abstract

Background Data: Spondylolysis is a stress fracture of the pars interarticularis that occurs in 2–5% of the population. Surgical techniques of spondylolysis repair have been challenging in the last decades.

Purpose: To compare pedicle screw-hook and pedicle screw-infraspinous wire fixation in pars repair clinically and radiologically.

Study Design: Retrospective comparative clinical case study.

Patients and Methods: Twenty-four patients with pars repair using pedicle screw-hook fixation (group I) compared with 21 patients using pedicle screw-infraspinous wire fixation (group II) were reported. Autogenous iliac bone grafting was performed in both groups. Two cases in group I had concomitant unilateral laminolysis with hypertrophied nonunion. All patients were assessed for back pain visual analog score (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) preoperatively. Clinical follow-up was conducted at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months using VAS and ODI. Union was assessed using multislice CT.

Results: At the final follow-up, back pain VAS and ODI improved significantly in both groups (P

Conclusion: Both pedicle screw-sublaminar hook and pedicle screw-infraspinous wire fixation plus autogenous bone graft have satisfactory outcomes in spondylolysis repair. Using screw-hook construct was associated with significant earlier union, and could be considered a good choice for combined spondylolysis and laminolysis.

Keywords

spondylolysis, pars fracture, laminolysis, pars repair, pedicle screw, sublaminar hook, infraspinous wire

Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
PlumX Metrics
  • Usage
    • Downloads: 306
    • Abstract Views: 173
  • Social Media
    • Shares, Likes & Comments: 23
see details

Share

COinS